The funniest academic tweets
Some funny stuff only academics will get.

Every. Damn. Time. pic.twitter.com/Bs8NzSLz00
— Dan Quintana (@dsquintana) July 17, 2020
it me during my postdoc pic.twitter.com/KKgXXntsL1
— Dr. Stevie Chancellor (@snchancellor) January 9, 2020
Hi everyone, here's some quality content to brighten your day: pic.twitter.com/RrxgKf5tpg
— Nathaniel Haines (@Nate__Haines) March 13, 2020
When you go to a conference and only know one other person pic.twitter.com/eHJEVKlH2Z
— David Howard (@Used_For_Glue) January 13, 2020
What every submission site should have pic.twitter.com/0AhenF0aB5
— PHD Comics (@PHDcomics) December 17, 2019
The postdoc to PI transition: https://t.co/wzqB5nBcpm
— Mike Feigin (@mikefeigin) December 16, 2019
Reading stats twitter. pic.twitter.com/8dLyCBoTbM
— Daniël Lakens @lakens@mastodon.social (@lakens) November 25, 2019
Scientist: carefully designs experiment
— Lionel Page (@page_eco) November 27, 2019
Participant:https://t.co/1a8FqbfCZc
“As requested by the reviewer, we double-checked the page numbers for each of our references” pic.twitter.com/9a4y1SGlEh
— Dan Quintana (@dsquintana) November 17, 2019
— Dr. Jess Hartnett 📊 (@Notawful) October 26, 2019
Publisher: "unless we charge USD 10,000 per article, we won't be able to survive"
— Alejandro Montenegro (@aemonten) October 25, 2019
Researchers: pic.twitter.com/oh2i4i4KdI
when double-blind peer review isn'tpic.twitter.com/POYerkoHtw
— Chaz Firestone (@chazfirestone) October 17, 2019
For my upcoming 2-day R workshop. pic.twitter.com/cJjmqi2aLp
— Darren Dahly https://mastodon.social/@statsepi (@statsepi) November 7, 2016
Me post submission proofing and finding mistakes everywhere @AcademicChatter #academictwitter
— Sam Westwood (@westwoodsam1) October 16, 2019
pic.twitter.com/WB2gkft53t
Buying a high spec computer to run t-tests pic.twitter.com/DQvlDUtAzh
— Dan Quintana (@dsquintana) October 5, 2019
Moving a figure in Word pic.twitter.com/ef7ctQn3R4
— Alejandro Montenegro (@aemonten) September 15, 2019
Academics: read the syllabus
— Dr Meryl Kenny (@merylkenny) September 12, 2019
Also academics: did you send that to me already, I get a lot of emails, I didn't read it, what did it say, can you send it again pic.twitter.com/xFaOwV9Z9h
when your deep learning model is literally just a logistic regression pic.twitter.com/YB1j1qqML0
— Kareem Carr | Data Scientist (@kareem_carr) August 29, 2019
How reimbursements in academia work: pic.twitter.com/XWEtz3rfXO
— Dani Beck, PhD (@_DaniBeck) August 22, 2019
🐿: Me
— Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti (@ChelseaParlett) August 1, 2019
🌼: a sufficiently large sample size pic.twitter.com/W5ypnRbzhS
manuscript_submission.mp4 pic.twitter.com/rkyJE1FbF5
— Dan Quintana (@dsquintana) October 21, 2018
Me, looking into the psychometrics literature to see if they've any analysis insights I should be using pic.twitter.com/2HYDmM3E7J
— tomstafford@mastodon.online (@tomstafford) July 26, 2019
Stack Overflow releases its own keyboard. pic.twitter.com/Nw7ts0Rf4V
— Khalil (@sehnaoui) June 21, 2019
"There's free food at this conference"
— Dani Beck, PhD (@_DaniBeck) May 24, 2019
Me: pic.twitter.com/DMsXarXqRz
this is upsettingly accurate pic.twitter.com/QLKIIYSVkf
— Rebecca Buxton (@RebeccaBuxton) April 26, 2019
Characterising today's attempts at trying to do research: pic.twitter.com/qhS3ydehk6
— Jon Tennant (@Protohedgehog) February 13, 2019
#rstats #rstatsmemes pic.twitter.com/MZBNvVseeO
— R Memes for Statistical Fiends (@rstatsmemes) September 25, 2018
Do you know other funny tweets? Let me know in the comments below! 🤗
Thanks for reading! Do not hesitate to tweet and share this post and don’t forget to join me on Twitter 🐦 @Dom_Makowski