In defence of the 95% CI

The one where I discuss arguments in favour of 95% instead of alternatives like 90 or 89%.

TLDR; BayestestR currently uses a 89% threshold by default for Credible Intervals (CI). Should we change that? If so, by what? Join the discussion here.

Magical numbers, or conventional thresholds, have bad press in statistics, and there are many of them. For instance, .05 (for the p-value), or the 95% range for the Confidence Interval (CI). Indeed, why 95 and not 94 or 90?

👉 Read my complete post on the easystats’ blog 👈


Thanks for reading! Do not hesitate to tweet and share this post, and leave a comment below 🤗

Dominique Makowski
Dominique Makowski
Presidential Research Fellow

Trained as neuropsychologist and CBT psychotherapist, I am currently working as a researcher at the Clinical Brain Lab in Singapore, on the neuroscience of reality perception.

Related